Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Technique Development"
From AltWiki
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly). | :I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly). | ||
:Also, I wish I could edit Rules pages to fix some grammatical/syntactical pet peeves of mine :( [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 23:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | :Also, I wish I could edit Rules pages to fix some grammatical/syntactical pet peeves of mine :( [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 23:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I think it was 60/140, but either one works really. --[[User:Ff0ecaf|Ff0ecaf]] 02:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 1 June 2008
So, if we change Excellent bias, we should also change Dismal bias to reflect it.
Excellent bias at 65% base, Dismal at 135% base, then? Or no? Comments/concerns/outright protests/french revolutions? --Ice 06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure this was what the previous idea was, lessening both extremes like this. I'm not sure whether it was 65/135 or 60/140 but either set of numbers works for me (I'm kind of tempted to see 65/135, honestly).
- Also, I wish I could edit Rules pages to fix some grammatical/syntactical pet peeves of mine :( Tiryst 23:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I think it was 60/140, but either one works really. --Ff0ecaf 02:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
