Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Pending Changes"

Revision as of 11:11, 23 February 2007

DV Escape Tech Nerf

Yea verily. Tiryst 02:40, 6 February 2007 (EST)

Seems fair enough. Talisantia 07:52, 6 February 2007 (EST)

Sounds good to me, too. The current state of DV Escape Techs is a bit too in favor of the DVs. Lampdevil 10:51, 6 February 2007 (EST)

Well, that's a bit of a surprise. Everyone who's commented so far is in accord with the change. I expected to have a few more opposing voices. Hroefn ^T 15:05, 16 February 2007 (EST)

Maybe we should actually inform the folks that are DVs? :D Lampdevil 15:09, 16 February 2007 (EST)

Tali has a DV, and I believe Dev has seen this as well, although he's not commented. I wasn't about to make it de jure right away anyway, though. Hroefn ^T 15:16, 16 February 2007 (EST)

Seems fair enough to me, though I've only played my DV once. So I can't really complain either way. Landra

(thumbs up) As a DVer, it sounds good. It works better to keep things a bit more even, I think. --Vraeyda 19:41, 20 February 2007 (EST)

I'm probably the only one complaining then. :D Mostly because this will more or less just incite people with declared villains to fight with people who they know they will win against, though there is also self-interest involved here in that it greatly limits my own DV's escape technique naturally. It almost completely negates the anti-escape tech as well, if you simply smack a villain before he or she can escape. I mean, if a character really wants to stop a villain from getting the hell out of a fight then get the anti-escape tech and do it. ur mom lawlz