Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Pending Changes"
From AltWiki
m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Well, that's a bit of a surprise. Everyone who's commented so far is in accord with the change. I expected to have a few more opposing voices. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[Talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 15:05, 16 February 2007 (EST) | :Well, that's a bit of a surprise. Everyone who's commented so far is in accord with the change. I expected to have a few more opposing voices. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[Talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 15:05, 16 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
:: Maybe we should actually inform the folks that are DVs? :D [[User:Lampdevil|Lampdevil]] 15:09, 16 February 2007 (EST) | :: Maybe we should actually inform the folks that are DVs? :D [[User:Lampdevil|Lampdevil]] 15:09, 16 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Tali has a DV, and I believe Dev has seen this as well, although he's not commented. I wasn't about to make it de jure right away anyway, though. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] <sup>'''[[Talk:Alothin|T]]'''</sup> 15:16, 16 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:16, 16 February 2007
DV Escape Tech Nerf
Yea verily. Tiryst 02:40, 6 February 2007 (EST)
Seems fair enough. Talisantia 07:52, 6 February 2007 (EST)
Sounds good to me, too. The current state of DV Escape Techs is a bit too in favor of the DVs. Lampdevil 10:51, 6 February 2007 (EST)
- Well, that's a bit of a surprise. Everyone who's commented so far is in accord with the change. I expected to have a few more opposing voices. Hroefn T 15:05, 16 February 2007 (EST)
- Maybe we should actually inform the folks that are DVs? :D Lampdevil 15:09, 16 February 2007 (EST)
