Difference between revisions of "Rules talk:Elves"
From AltWiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Looking all right. However, I'm not sure the Arcane Tradition/Family Spec combo is as effective of a disadvantage as might be assumed. At the most, it'll cost the character 500 PL, put to a "useless" PL type.[[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 20:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT) | Looking all right. However, I'm not sure the Arcane Tradition/Family Spec combo is as effective of a disadvantage as might be assumed. At the most, it'll cost the character 500 PL, put to a "useless" PL type.[[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 20:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Good point. I was thinking of fixing that by requiring that one-third of gains, up to maximum allowable cap, would be required to be put to the secondary power level(s). How about that? [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 23:29, 28 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:29, 28 August 2006
Looking all right. However, I'm not sure the Arcane Tradition/Family Spec combo is as effective of a disadvantage as might be assumed. At the most, it'll cost the character 500 PL, put to a "useless" PL type.Tiryst 20:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
- Good point. I was thinking of fixing that by requiring that one-third of gains, up to maximum allowable cap, would be required to be put to the secondary power level(s). How about that? Hroefn 23:29, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
