Difference between revisions of "Talk:Villains"
From AltWiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I intended it for both dead and live villains -- thus the Status tag at the end of the summary. So yes, go ahead and add yours. Historical records are good. I intended it for player (both DV and regular) villains rather than plot villains, though. The saga records should be sufficient information on plot villains, I think. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 17:58, 14 June 2006 (CDT) | :I intended it for both dead and live villains -- thus the Status tag at the end of the summary. So yes, go ahead and add yours. Historical records are good. I intended it for player (both DV and regular) villains rather than plot villains, though. The saga records should be sufficient information on plot villains, I think. [[User:Alothin|Hroefn]] 17:58, 14 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I figured as much with the status tag, but yknow, doublechecking and all. :) And the point about sagas/plot villains is perfectly reasonable. [[User:Tiryst|Tiryst]] 18:01, 14 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:01, 14 June 2006
Will dead villains be counted here too? Additionally, is this for DVs and villainous comps only, or for plot villains as well? Tiryst 17:53, 14 June 2006 (CDT)
- I intended it for both dead and live villains -- thus the Status tag at the end of the summary. So yes, go ahead and add yours. Historical records are good. I intended it for player (both DV and regular) villains rather than plot villains, though. The saga records should be sufficient information on plot villains, I think. Hroefn 17:58, 14 June 2006 (CDT)
- I figured as much with the status tag, but yknow, doublechecking and all. :) And the point about sagas/plot villains is perfectly reasonable. Tiryst 18:01, 14 June 2006 (CDT)
